The National Green Tribunal allowed the applicant's permission to withdraw the original application with liberty to file a fresh properly drafted application, per se dismissing it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 07
Court No. 1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No. 1056/2024
Sudhir Kumar Jha
Applicant
Versus
Gorakhpur Development Authority Anr. Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 12.08.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: Mr. Vishal Arun Mishra, Adv. for Applicant (Through VC)
ORDER
original application with liberty to file a fresh properly drafted application.
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
Arun Kumar Tyagi, JM
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
August 12, 2024 HB
1
Sudhir Kumar Jha
Gorakhpur Development Authority
Prakash Shrivastava
Arun Kumar Tyagi
Dr. A. Senthil Vel
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
