Allowed

Mahesh Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh through Chief Secretary

NGT7 Aug 2024IA No. 353/2024 in Original Application No. 275/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The National Green Tribunal allowed the State of Uttar Pradesh's application for a one-month extension to demarcate the flood plain zone of the Yamuna river. It also listed the pending matter for the Hindon river to be heard concurrently.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time for one month granted for demarcation of flood plain zone of river Yamuna in Ghaziabad and Gautam Budh Nagar District.

Mahesh Kumar vs State of Uttar Pradesh through Chief… — Environment and Pollution | NGT (2024)

¶1

Item No. 16

¶2

Court No. 1

¶3

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

¶4

Original Application No. 275/2023 (I.A. No.869/2023, I.A. No. 353/2024)

¶5

Mahesh Kumar Applicant Versus

¶6

State of Uttar Pradesh through Chief Secretary Respondent Date of hearing: 07.08.2024

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER

¶8

Applicant: Mr. Satyabeer Singh, Adv. for Applicant in OA 275/2023 (Through VC) Respondent: Ms. Garima Prashad, AAG with Ms. Priyanka Swami, Mr. Shlok Mittal, Ms. Simran Sehgal & Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advs. for the State of UP Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vipin Saxsena & Mr. Shivam Saksena, Advs. for Greater Noida Mr. Pradeep Misra & Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advs. for UPPCB (Through VC) Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Adv. for Noida Authority Mr. Pramod Kr. Tiwari & Mr Syed Mohd. Mylab, Advs. in I.A No. 869/2023 Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Mr. Akash Karanwal & Mr. Amrender Ray, Advs. for Intervenors (Through VC)

¶9

ORDER

¶10

The issue involved in this Original Application relates to demarcation of flood plain zone of river Yamuna and Hindon in the stretch of 75 Kms in Gautam Budh Nagar and 10 Kms in Ghaziabad so

¶11

far as river Yamuna is concerned.

¶12

Learned AAG on the pervious date had sought four week’s time for

¶13

demarcation of flood plain in the stretch of 75 Kms. I.A. No. 353/2024 has been filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh seeking extension of time for

¶14

¶15

demarcation of flood plain zone in the stretch of river Yamuna disclosing the reasons for the delay. The application states that the issues have been resolved and Survey of India will complete the exercise starting from 06.08.2024 till 25.08.2024. Learned AAG has informed that the said exercise has been started by the Survey of India with effect from 06.08.2024 and it will be completed by 25.08.2024 as discoed in the I.A. In this background, the prayer for extension of time has been made.

¶16

On due consideration, I.A. No. 353/2024 is allowed and the time for demarcation of flood plain zone of river Yamuna in Ghaziabad and Gautam Budh Nagar District is extended by one month as prayed.

¶17

So far as the demarcation of flood plain zone of river Hindon is concerned, Learned AAG has submitted that OA No. 569/2023, Alok Kumar vs. Union of India & Ors. on this issue is pending before the Tribunal and in that matter, time has been extended for demarcation. She has informed that the said matter is coming up on 24.10.2024.

¶18

List along with O.A. No. 569/2023 on 24.10.2024.

¶19

Prakash Shrivastava, CP

¶20

Arun Kumar Tyagi, JM

¶21

Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM

¶22

August 07, 2024 Original Application No. 275/2023 (I.A. No.869/2023, I.A. No. 353/2024) SN

¶23

Mahesh Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh through Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh through Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Restorehealth Medicare Private Limited vs Madhya Pradesh State Environment Assessment Authority (Mpseiaa) through the Member Secretary E-5 Paryavaran Parisar Bhawan Arera Colony Bhopal (M.P.)

Restorehealth Medicare Private Limited vs Madhya Pradesh State Environment Assessment Authority (Mpseiaa) through the Member Secretary E-5 Paryavaran Parisar Bhawan Arera Colony Bhopal (M.P.)

Ms Slaughter House Nagar Nigam Saharanpur vs Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board

Manjeet Bhardwaj and Others vs

Shri Rajender Gangsari vs

E.V. Sampath vs Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Rep by Its Member Secretary

E.V. Sampath vs Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Rep by Its Member Secretary

E.V. Sampath vs Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Rep by Its Member Secretary

Ms Slaughter House Nagar Nigam Saharanpur vs Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board

M C Dwivedi vs

Priyank Bharati vs State of Uttar Pradesh through Chief Secretary

Attar Singh vs

Satish Kapoor vs

Vicky Son of Atul Kumar vs