Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition due to a subsequent event. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
LAISHRAM Digitally signed by LAISHRAM DHAKESHO DHAKESHORI DEVI RI DEVI Date: 2021.09.03 15:54:54 +05'30'
Item No. 31
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR : AT IMPHAL
W.P.(C) No. 183 of 2021
Nancy Potsangbam ... Petitioner -Versus-
The State of Manipur & 4 ors. …Respondents
B E F O R E
03.09.2021
When the matter is taken up for consideration, it has been prayed by Mr. M. Rakesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that in view of the subsequent event, he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition.
Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Mr. K. Lupenjit, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 3.
Copies of this order shall be sent to the learned counsels appearing for the parties through their WhatsApp/e-mail.
JUDGE
Dhakeshori
Nancy Potsangbam
The State of Manipur
LAISHRAM DHAKESHO DHAKESHORI DEVI RI DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
