A.T.R.Gopalsamy v. The Revenue Divisional Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P.(MD)No.5850 of 2026, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 04.03.2026 by S.Srimathy, J. Petitioner A.T.R.Gopalsamy (represented by power agent S.T.Thirumanipandiyan) v. Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti and Tahsildar, Kovilpatti Taluk, Thoothukudi District. Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to consider representation dated 25.04.2024; enquiry directed with notice to petitioner and rival claimants if any; orders within eight weeks; petition disposed of, no costs. Counsel: S.Kumar for petitioner; D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader, for respondents.
What did the court decide?
Mandamus direction to the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry after notice to the petitioner and rival claimants, if any, and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks of receipt of a copy of the order; writ petition disposed of with no costs.