Disposed¶21

Ramakrishnan.M v. the Executive Engineer

Madras HC9 Jan 2026WP(MD)/550/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition (Certiorari, Article 226) against Form-1 proceedings dated 27.12.2021 of Assistant Engineer, PWD (WRO) Upper Vaippar Basin Division regarding item No.6, Periyaparaikulam Tank, Narnapuram Village, Sivagiri Taluk, Tenkasi District; respondents included Executive Engineer PWD Virudhunagar and Assistant Director, Fisheries and Fisherman Welfare Department, Tirunelveli; closed as infructuous on counsel's submission; no order as to costs; connected W.M.P.(MD)No.423 of 2022 closed; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; single judge R. Vijayakumar J.; decided 09.01.2026.

What did the court decide?

None; the Writ Petition was closed as infructuous with no order as to costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was also closed. No merits were adjudicated and the impugned Form-1 proceedings were not quashed. ¶21

Ramakrishnan.M Vs the Executive Engineer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.550 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 09.01.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.550 of 2022 and W.M.P(MD) No.423 of 2022

M.Ramakrishnan

... Petitioner

The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (WRO) Upper Vaippar Basin Division, Virudhunagar District.

¶11

The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department (WRO) Upper Vaippar Basin Division, Virudhunagar District.

¶12

The Assistant Director, Fisheries and Fisherman Welfare Department, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the second respondent herein in his proceedings in Form-1, dated 27.12.2021 in respect of item No.6 for Periyaparaikulam Tank, Narnapuram Village, Sivagiri Taluk, Tenkasi District and quash the same.

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.(MD).No.550 of 2022

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Alagusundar

¶18

For Respondents : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.

¶21

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶22

09.01.2026 NCC : Yes/No 1/2 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.(MD).No.550 of 2022

¶26

¶27