A writ petition seeking quashing of an order and reduction of the lease amount for fishery rights of Thattankulam Pond was dismissed as infructuous at counsel's instance, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 09.01.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P.(MD)No.14290 of 2022 and W.M.P(MD)No.10211 of 2022
Marimuthu
...Petitioner
B4/63, 80
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to impugned order of the 2nd respondent by his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 1534/E/2021 dated 11.02.2022 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reduce the lease amount for the fishery rights of Thattankulam Pond for the period of 5 years commencing from 01.07.2019 to 30.06.2024 by calculating the actual extent of the said Pond.
1/4
For Petitioner : M/s.D.Venkatesh For Respondents : M/s.M.Gangadharan Government Advocate
ORDER
The learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
09.01.2026
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR
2/4
To
3/4
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
RJR
W.P.(MD)No.14290 of 2022
09.01.2026
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Marimuthu
The Deputy Director of Fisheries, Madurai Zone
The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Dindigul
R.Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
