Jaikumar v. The Assistant Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; decision date 03.03.2026; W.P.(MD)No.4437 of 2026 with connected W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3704 and 3706 of 2026; petitioner Jaikumar vs (1) Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District and (2) Executive Officer, Arulmigu Abathasahayeswarar Swamy Temple, Aduthurai, Thanjavur District; writ of certiorari under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against temple/HR&CE order dated 05.02.2026; dismissed as infructuous after counsel reported possession had already been taken from the petitioner; no costs; single judge D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.; no cases cited; no monetary award.
What did the court decide?
In view of respondents' counsel reporting that possession had already been taken from the petitioner, nothing further survives for adjudication in the writ petition; the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, without costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.