3 . The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the subject property is ancestral in nature and has been in the continuous possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s family for several decades. It is further submitted that, due to an apparent error, the property has been wrongly classified in the revenue records as “Adi Dravidar Poramboke Natham”, which is factually incorrect and contrary to the petitioner’s lawful title and possession. Aggrieved by the said erroneous entry, the petitioner submitted an appeal before the second respondent seeking mutation of patta and correction of the revenue records. However, despite the lapse of considerable time, no action has been taken on the petitioner’s representation. Hence, the present Writ Petition.