M.Mayakrishnan v. The Engineer in Chief / The Chief Engineer (General)
Case brief
What is this about?
Departmental enquiry; furnishing of documents listed in Annexure-III of charge memo; disciplinary authority cannot direct charged officer to approach Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department for documents; fair opportunity to defend; writ of certiorarified mandamus under Article 226; WP(MD) No.19697 of 2026, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Mummineni Sudheer Kumar J, decided 13/07/2026; Enquiry Notice Ka.No.Se.Po/Enquiry Officer/2025/Kamukkam dated 02.07.2026; charge memo No.CII(3)/2415/2024-14 dated 28.05.2025; Water Resources Department; connected WMP(MD) Nos.14543, 14544 and 14545 of 2026 closed; no costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with a direction to the respondents to furnish the documents mentioned in Annexure-III of charge memo No.CII(3)/2415/2024-14 dated 28.05.2025 within one week of receipt of the order; petitioner to submit his explanation within a further two weeks of receipt of the documents; enquiry, if deemed necessary by the respondents, to proceed in accordance with law. No costs; connected miscellaneous petitions (WMP(MD)Nos.14543, 14544 and 14545 of 2026) closed.