Dismissed¶47

Ganesan. T v. The Commissioner

Madras HC19 Jan 2026WP(MD)/1849/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution; writ of mandamus; housing plot allotment 2400 Sq.ft per petitioner; patta issuance; Sree Sabari Mills; Kottapattu Village; S.Nos.128/2, 129, 130; 30 Acres 86 Cent; Urban Land Ceiling authorities; Tiruchirappalli; Amalgamated Coalfields Limited; Article 226 Constitution of India; no appearance by petitioners' counsel; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; K. Surender J.; 19.01.2026; W.P.(MD) No.1849 of 2021.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, there having been no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 05.01.2026 and again on 20.01.2026 when the matter was listed under the caption 'For Dismissal'. ¶47

Ganesan. T Vs The Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.1849 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 19.01.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.1849 of 2021

¶7

1.T.Ganesan

¶8

2.A.Mallika

¶9

3.S.Geethamani

4.P.Nallammal

5.P.Amudha

6.K.Mookayi

7.C.Pushpavalli

¶14

8.C.Philominal

¶15

9.Palaniyammal

10.S.Lakshmanan

11.M.Subramani

12.C.Kuzhandairaj

13.Vadagiri

14.Ennasimuthu

15.Karuppaiya

Page No. 1 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.(MD) No.1849 of 2021

¶25

16.M.Balamuthu 17.R.Thomas 18.V.Jeyaseeli 19.C.Devi 20.N.Rethinam

¶26

21.Parameswari

¶27

22.T.Pappathi 23.S.Packiyam ... Petitioners Vs.

¶28

1.The Commissioner, Urban Land Ceiling and Regularization, Chepauk, Chennai- 600 005.

¶29

2.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District.

¶30

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Urban Land Ceiling and Land Tax, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District.

¶31

4.The Tahsildar, Tiruchirappalli East Taluk, Trichy District.

¶32

5.M/s. The Amalgamated Coalfields Limited, Rep. by its authorized signatory Mr.C.Sitaram

¶33

Page No. 2 of 5

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.(MD) No.1849 of 2021

¶36

Having its office at K.Sathanur Village K.K.Nagar, Trichy.

¶37

... Respondents

¶38

[R5 is substituted vide order dated.27.11.2023 passed in W.M.P.(MD).3319 of 2021]

¶39

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allot Housing Plot to an extent of 2400 Sq.ft to each petitioner at S.Nos.128/2, 129, 130 to an extent of 30 Acres and 86 Cent belonging to Sree Sabari Mills situated at Kottapattu Village and consequently directing the fourth respondent to issue patta in the petitioners’ names by considering the petitioners’ representation dated 09.03.2020.

¶40

For Petitioners : No appearance For R1 to R4 : Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate For R5 : Mr.R.Subramanian *****

¶41

O R D E R

¶42

When the case was taken up for hearing on 05.01.2026, there was

¶43

no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the case was directed to be listed on 20.01.2026, i.e., today, under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

¶44

____________ Page No. 3 of 5_

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P.(MD) No.1849 of 2021

¶47