A.Selvam Vs The Commissioner

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certioarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned notice dated 01.06.2026 issued by the fifth respondent demanding payment of GST at 18% in respect of the concluded licence periods covered under Pasali Nos.1434 and 1435 pertaining to the sale of Archanai Porutkal at Arulmigu Chitira Ratha Vallaba Perumal Thirukovil, Kuruvithurai, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District, quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and without authority of law and consequently direct the respondents not to demand or collect GST or any consequential amount from the petitioner in respect of Pasali Nos. 1434 and 1435.

¶27

For Petitioner : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan for Mr.S.Srikanth

¶28

For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.Parthiban Government Standing Counsel For R5 : Mr.S.Manohar Standing Counsel

¶29

ORDER

¶30

This writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶31

2 . The issue involved in the present writ petition is no longer res

¶32

integra and stands covered by the order of this Court in V.S.Raghavan

¶33

Page No. 2 of 5

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.(MD) No.18092 of 2026

¶36

vs.

¶37

vs. The Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer, Arulmighu

¶38

Mariamman Temple, Samayapuram, Trichy and others [W.P.(MD) No.17590 of 2025, dated 31.07.2025]. In paragraph 2 of the said order, this Court extracted the contents of the counter affidavit filed in the writ petition. Thereafter, in paragraph 3, this Court observed as follows:

¶39

''3.It is further noted that, as far as the petitioner is concerned, he is involved in the sale of Prasadams inside the temple, which is exempt under Notification No.2/2017 – Central Tax (Rate), Serial No.98, and the corresponding Notification issued by the State Government.''

¶40

3 . Since the issue involved in the present writ petition is prima facie covered in favour of the petitioner, I am of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of at the stage of admission in terms of the decision of this Court in V.S.Raghavan's case, referred to supra.

¶41

4 . Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. However, it is open to the GST Authorities as well as the respondents to proceed further in accordance with law.

¶42

NCC : Yes / No smn2

¶43

30.06.2026

¶44

____________ Page No. 3 of 5_

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P.(MD) No.18092 of 2026

¶47

To