Saravanan v. The Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court writ petition (criminal) WP Crl. No. 938 of 2026 (05-06-2026, G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J.); petitioner P. Saravanan seeks police protection for person and 24-acre leasehold (Ka.Sa.272-275, 258/2, 259, Pulianthope house, Kalivalasu, Kangeyam Taluk, Tiruppur) and action against private respondents 3-8 for criminal threats/false implication; Article 226 mandamus; outcome: enquiry directed on representation dated 03.04.2026 with notices and four-week deadline; petition disposed of on merits-unaddressed basis, no costs; no statutory provisions beyond Article 226; no cases cited.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the second respondent (Inspector of Police, Kangeyam Police Station) to conduct an enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 03.04.2026 after issuing notice to the petitioner, respondents 3 to 8 and counter parties, if any, and to dispose of it within four (4) weeks from receipt of a copy of the order; writ petition disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits and without costs.