Disposed¶21

Tmt. v. Joicy Meriyn v The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC5 Jun 2026WP Crl./760/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; WP Crl. No. 760 of 2026; G.K. Ilanthiraiyan J.; writ of mandamus; Article 226; direction to police to act on representation dated 27.02.2026; complaint withdrawn by petitioner; writ petition closed, no costs; Coimbatore; All Women Police Station, Perur; 3rd respondent Jeo Soundarian.

What did the court decide?

Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioner's complaint dated 27.02.2026 against the third respondent had already been withdrawn, the Writ Petition (Criminal) stands closed, with no costs. ¶21

Tmt. v. Joicy Meriyn Vs The Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP Crl. No. 760 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 760 of 2026

¶6

Tmt. V. Joicy Meriyn D/o.Venies No.5/7 New Anna Nagar Poluvampatti Nagar, Thondamuthur Coimbatore 641 109

¶7

..Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

The Superintendent of Police Office of the District Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore.

¶10

The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Perur Coimbatore

¶11

Jeo Soundarian, S/o.Udayan, Vadalulam, Tirunelveli District.

¶12

..Respondent(s)

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct enquiry and initiate appropriate action against 3rd respondent on the basis of petitioner’s representation dated 27.02.2026.

¶14

For Petitioner(s): For Respondent(s):	D.Krishnamoorthy A.Chinnakaruppaiya Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar
	Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
	for R1 & R2

¶15

__________ Page1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

WP Crl. No. 760 of 2026

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct enquiry and initiate appropriate action against third respondent on the basis of petitioner’s representation dated 27.02.2026.

¶20

2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner had lodged a complaint dated 27.02.2026 before the first respondent against the third respondent. It is further submitted that the said complaint dated 27.02.2026 has already been withdrawn by the petitioner.

¶21

3. Recording the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands closed. No costs.

¶22

05-06-2026

¶23

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶24

¶25

__________ Page2 of 4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27