Ct.Chidambaram v. The Industries Commissioner and
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court; WP No. 958 of 2026; decided 22-01-2026; Judge M. Dhandapani. Petitioner CT.Chidambaram; Respondent: Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries and Commerce (SIDCO), Guindy, Chennai. Subject: direction to consider representation dated 06.10.2025 seeking sanction/processing and grant of pension for service rendered; writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India; representation unanswered; disposal with direction to decide on merits within six weeks; no opinion on merits; counsel Kaushik N.Sharma (petitioner) and T.M.Rajangam, Government Advocate (respondent); no costs.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.10.2025 on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within six weeks from receipt of a copy of the order; writ petition disposed of with no costs.