Dismissed¶17
A.Ganesh v. The District Collector
Madras HCWP/7613/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Madras High Court writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn; Article 226 Certiorarified Mandamus; impugned charge memo Na.Ka.No.P.A.1/11191/2018 dated 26.04.2019; District Collector Cuddalore District; Rule 17 (b) / 17 (a) TNCS (D & A) Rules; counsel endorsement withdrawal; connected miscellaneous petitions closed; no costs; petitioners A.Ganesh and K.R.Siva; advocates M.Vignesh Raj, M.Muthappan; Special Government Pleader V.Yamunadevi; decided 27.01.2026 by T.Vinod Kumar J.; no merits adjudication — cite only if procedural relevance of withdrawal needed.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw recorded; petitions dismissed as withdrawn; connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed; no costs. No relief on merits; the charge memo was neither quashed nor altered. ¶17