P.Rajavel Vs The District Collector

PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2^nd respondent herein to remove the name of 4^th respondent’s father namely Late. Aadhimoola Udaiyar from the UDR Patta No.742 issued by the 3^rd respondent in respect of comprised Survey No.79/4-6 cents property situated at Virugavoor Revenue Village, Kallakurichi Taluk and District based on the basis of representation made on 18.12.2025.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

WP No. 5078 of 2026

¶17

For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Tamizhi For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt. Advocate For R1 to R3

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the 2^nd respondent to remove the name of the 4^th respondent’s father namely Late Aadhimoola Udaiyar from the UDR Patta No.742 issued by the 3^rd respondent for the property more fully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner’s representation dated 18.12.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶20

2.The petitioner seeks to make corrections in the UDR Patta No.742 issued by the 3^rd respondent in respect of the property more fully described in the prayer to this writ petition by removing the name of the 4^th respondent’s father late Aadhimoola Udaiyar. The petitioner had given a representation dated 18.12.2025 along with supporting documents in support of his representation for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered by the official respondents, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶21

3.Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

WP No. 5078 of 2026

¶24

4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation dated 18.12.2025 is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the 4^th respondent and any other third party whom the 3^rd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within the time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶25

5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation dated 18.12.2025.

¶26

6.Since no adverse orders are passed against the 4^th respondent, notice to the 4^th respondent is dispensed with by this Court in this writ petition.

¶27

7.For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 3^rd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation dated 18.12.2025 seeking for removal of the name of the 4^th respondent’s father late Aadhimoola Udaiyar from the UDR patta No.742 issued by the 3^rd respondent for the property more fully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the 4^th respondent and any other third party, whom the 3^rd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

WP No. 5078 of 2026

¶30

8.With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶31

12-02-2026

¶32

rst

¶33

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No