Disposed¶23

S.Vijaya v. the District Collector

Madras HC6 Jan 2026WP/50532/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patta; representation dated 31.10.2025; direction to consider representation; Tahsildar Walajah Taluk; District Collector Ranipet; Revenue Divisional Officer Ranipet; Vasantham Gardens layout; D.D.T.C.C.P. No.23/2010; Plot No.52; Ward No.2; Ananthalai Village; T.S.No.12; 1500 Sq.ft.; 12 weeks timeline; writ petition disposed; no costs; Madras High Court; Abdul Quddhose J.; counsel S. Hemalatha; Special Government Pleader D. Ravichander.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of by directing the second respondent (Tahsildar, Walajah Taluk, Ranipet District) to consider the petitioner's representation dated 31.10.2025 with supporting documents for issuance of patta and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law within 12 weeks from receipt of a copy of the order; no costs. ¶23

S.Vijaya Vs the District Collector — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶23

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents should consider the petitioner's representation dated 31.10.2025 and grant patta to the petitioner for the property described in the prayer (Plot No.52, Ward No.2, Ananthalai Village Block No.1, T.S.No.12, 1500 Sq.ft., Vasantham Gardens layout, approved vide D.D.T.C.C.P. No.23/2010, Walajah Taluk).

¶19

Court's answer

No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by the Court.

¶23

Ratio / Principle

The writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent (Tahsildar, Walajah Taluk) to consider the petitioner's representation dated 31.10.2025 along with the supporting documents for issuance of patta for the property described in the prayer, and to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law.

¶23

Key takeaways

Final orders on the patta request are to be passed within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.ratio¶28

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court (Abdul Quddhose, J.), WP No. 50532 of 2025, decided 06-01-2026: S.Vijaya sought a direction to the District Collector, Tahsildar (Walajah Taluk) and Revenue Divisional Officer (Ranipet District) to consider her representation dated 31.10.2025 and grant patta for Plot No.52, Ward No.2, Ananthalai Village Block No.1, T.S.No.12, measuring 1500 Sq.ft., in the duly formed Vasantham Gardens layout approved vide D.D.T.C.C.P. No.23/2010, Walajah Taluk. Holding that no prejudice would be caused to the respondents, the Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the second respondent (Tahsildar) to consider the representation dated 31.10.2025 along with supporting documents for issuance of patta and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law within 12 weeks from receipt of a copy of the order. No costs.

¶1

WP No. 50532 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 06-01-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 50532 of 2025

S.Vijaya

..Petitioner(s)

The District Collector, District Collector Office Ranipet, Ranipet District.

¶10

The Tahsildar, Walajah Taluk, Ranipet District.

¶11

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of RDO, Ranipet District.

¶12

..Respondent(s)

¶13

Directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 31.10.2025 and subsequently grant patta to the petitioner’s property at Plot No.52, Ward No.2, Ananthalai Village Block No.1, T.S.No.12, measuring an extent of 1500 Sq.ft., comprised in duly formed layout Vasantham Gardens, approved vide D.D.T.C.C.P. No.23/2010, Walajah Taluk, Vellore District.

¶14

For Petitioner(s): Ms.S. HEMALATHA For Respondent(s): MR.D.RAVICHANDER, SGP FOR RESPONDENTS

¶15

__________Page 1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

WP No. 50532 of 2025

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to grant patta to the petitioner for the property morefully described in the prayer

¶20

to this writ petition based on her representation dated 31.10.2025.

¶21

The petitioner claims that she is the owner of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, and she is in peaceful possession of the same. The petitioner has filed supporting documents before this Court to support her contentions. The petitioner has applied for patta with the respondents. Since the said application has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶22

Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶23

No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the aforesaid representation of the petitioner is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 31.10.2025 along with the supporting

¶24

__________Page 2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

WP No. 50532 of 2025

¶27

documents for issuance of patta for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, and to pass final orders on merits and in accordance

¶28

with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

¶29

order. No Costs.

¶30

06-01-2026

¶31

Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM

¶32

¶33