Dismissed¶25

Mr.I.Srinivas Naik, v. The Union of India

Madras HC10 Apr 2026WP/40021/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; WP No. 40021 of 2016; I. Srinivas Naik v. Union of India and CISF authorities (Director General, DIG South Zone, Group Commandant Cochin, Deputy Commandant NMPT Mangalore); dismissal for non-prosecution; no representation by petitioner on 02.04.2026 and 10.04.2026; writ of certiorarified mandamus under Article 226; challenge to CISF order No.E-36017/CISF/ NMPT/Doc/16/791 dated 21.06.2016; restoration of one increment and monetary benefits; WMP.No.34081 closed; no costs; K. Surender, J.; decided 10-04-2026.

What did the court decide?

In view of the petitioner having no representation at the hearing on 02.04.2026 and again on the adjourned date, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶25

Mr.I.Srinivas Naik, Vs The Union of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 40021 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP No. 40021 of 2016

¶6

and WMP.No.34081 of

Mr.I.Srinivas Naik

..Petitioner(s)

The Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi.

¶11

The Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, CISF Headquarters, Block No.13, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi.

¶12

The Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, South Zone, Head Quarters, Bajaji Bhawan, Besant Nagar, Chennai-600 090.

¶13

The Group Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Group Head Quarters, Block No.C-2, Kendriya Bhavan, Post CSEZ, Cochin-37.

¶14

The Deputy Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force Unit, NMPT, Mangalore.

¶15

..Respondent(s)

¶16

Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 5th respondent dated 21.06.2016 in his order No.E-36017/CISF/ NMPT/Doc/16/791, and quash the same and to direct the

¶17

Page1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

WP No. 40021 of 2016

¶20

respondents to restore the One Increment and to pay all monetary benefits

¶21

For Petitioner(s): NA For Respondent(s): NA

¶22

ORDER

¶23

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 02.04.2026, there was no

¶24

representation on behalf of the petitioner. In order to afford the petitioner an opportunity to prosecute the case, the matter was adjourned to today. However, even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶25