The Repatriates Cooperative Finance and development Bank Ltd. Vs the Principal Secretary to Government

¶1

WP No. 37683 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 18-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

WP No. 37683 of 2024 AND WMP NO. 40742 OF 2024

¶7

The Repatriates Co-operative Finance and Development Bank Ltd., (Repco Bank), Rep. by its Branch Manager, having its branch at T.Nagar Branch, No.33, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600017.

¶8

..Petitioner(s)

¶9

Vs

¶10

The Principal Secretary To Government Housing And Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Govt. Of Tamil Nadu,

¶11

Chennai-600 009.

¶12

The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai, No.1 Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore Chennai-600 008.

¶13

The Chief Executive Officer Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai No1 Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore Chennai-600 088.

¶14

The Senior Estate Officer A.D.Unit Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai No1 Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore Chennai-600 008

¶15

Chief Administrative Officer Market Management Committee Koyambedu Wholesale Market Complex, Koyambedu Chennai-600 008.

¶16

__________ Page1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WP No. 37683 of 2024

¶19

6. A Chinnadurai 7. C Subha

¶20

..Respondent(s)

¶21

Prayer:

¶22

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd Respondent in Letter No.K5/1290/2020 dated 25.11.2024 and quash the same and further direct the 2nd respondent to release the sale consideration of the 6th Respondent to and in favour of the Petitioner herein.

¶23

For Petitioner(s):	MR.A.Ilangovan
For Respondent(s):	MR.L.Gokulraj, Govt. Counsel For R1 Ms.P.Veena Suresh For R2 To R5
	MR.K.Sarath Chandran For R6 R7-NA

¶24

Order

¶25

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of

¶26

this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle.

¶27

2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶28

18-06-2026

¶29

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No pri

¶30

Page2 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

WP No. 37683 of 2024

¶33

To