Dismissed¶35

K.Maharani v. the State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC2 Feb 2026WP/2965/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: writ petition withdrawn; endorsement in Court bundle; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed; W.M.P.No.3250 of 2025; certiorarified mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; patta and chitta records update; online patta; Thasildar Nallampalli Taluk Dharmapuri; proceedings Na.Ka.No.3873/2022/E1 dated 26.09.2022; Revenue Department Government of Tamil Nadu; District Collector Dharmapuri; Village Administrative Officer A.Jettihalli. Relevant for: procedural example of withdrawal of a writ petition by counsel's endorsement; contains no holding on the merits of patta/chitta or revenue-record disputes.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs and the connected miscellaneous petition W.M.P.No.3250 of 2025 closed. ¶35

K.Maharani Vs the State of Tamilnadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P.No.2965 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 02.02.2026

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.No.2965 of 2025 and

¶7

W.M.P.No.3250 of 2025

¶8

1.K.Maharani

¶9

2.C.Mangammal

¶10

3.M.Sala

¶11

4.M.Shobana

¶12

5.R.Sathya

¶13

... Petitioners

¶14

Vs.

¶15

1.The State of Tamil Nadu,

¶16

rep. by its Secretary to the Government, Revenue Department,

¶17

Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶18

2.The District Collector, Dharmapuri District.

¶19

3.The District Revenue Officer, Dharmapuri District.

¶20

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri District.

¶21

5.The Thasildar, Nallampalli Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

¶22

Page No.1 of 4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No.2965 of 2025

¶25

6.The Village Administrative Officer, A.Jettihalli Village, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents

¶26

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 5 th respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.3873/2022/E1 dated 26.09.2022 and quash the same and consequently directing the 5 th respondent to update the petitioner’s name in online patta and chitta records as per the patta issued with respect to their lands and also directing the 1 st respondent to give stringent instructions to dispose the applications on merits at the first instance to avoid multiple litigations and to save the precious time of this Court.

¶27

For Petitioners : Mr.Krishnasamy Chinnasamy For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader *****

¶28

ORDER

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court

¶30

to withdraw this writ petition. He has made an endorsement to that effect

¶31

in the Court bundle.

¶32

Page No.2 of 4