Dismissed¶22

C.R.TamilSelvan v. the Principal Secretary to Government

Madras HC30 Jan 2026WP/1810/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; petitioner C.R.TamilSelvan vs Principal Secretary to Government (Home, Prohibition and Excise Dept) and Managing Director TASMAC; challenge to TASMAC Circular No.13/2025 dated 21.08.2025 (Na.Ka.No.R3/8849/2022); TASMAC Bottle Buy-Back Scheme alternate implementation method; representation dated 11.09.2025 through Association; withdrawal with court-bundle endorsement; connected WMP Nos.1895 & 1896 of 2026 closed; no costs; Judge Abdul Quddhose; decided 30-01-2026.

What did the court decide?

None; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, who made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle; connected WMPs were closed and no costs were awarded. ¶22

C.R.TamilSelvan Vs the Principal Secretary to Government — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WP No. 1810 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 30-01-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

WP No. 1810 of 2026 AND WMP NOs.1895 & 1896 OF 2026

C.R.TamilSelvan

..Petitioner(s)

THE PRINCIPAL Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and excise Dept Secretariat, Fort St. George,

¶11

Chennai-09

¶12

The Managing director Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC)

¶13

CMDA Tower- II, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai-08.

¶14

..Respondent(s)

¶15

Calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned Circular dated 21.08.2025 made in Na.Ka.No.R3/ 8849/ 2022, circular No.13/2025 by respondent No.2 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondent No.2 herein to devise alternate method for implementing the TASMAC Bottle Buy- Back Scheme by considering Petitioners representation dated 11.09.2025 sent though Association.

¶16

Page1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WP No. 1810 of 2026

¶19

For Petitioner(s): Mr.S. Bharanidharan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Anandakumar for R1

¶20

Mr.K.Sathishkumar for R2

¶21

Order

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected WMPs are closed. No costs.

¶23

30-01-2026

¶24

VGA

¶25

__________ Page2 of 4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

WP No. 1810 of 2026

¶28

¶29