Disposed¶24

Dr. Parimal Roy, v. the Chairman

Madras HC11 Jun 2026WP/29155/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras HC, T. Vinod Kumar, J.; WP No. 29155 of 2010 & M.P.No.1 of 2010; decided 11-06-2026; closed as infructuous, no costs, connected misc. petition closed; petitioner Dr. Parimal Roy; respondents ASRB (Chairman and Secretary) and Dr.Divakar Hemadri; Article 226 petition concerning award of 9 marks for academic qualifications under ASRB Advertisement No.03/2008 for Principal Scientist post at Project Directorate on Animal Disease Monitoring and Surveillance, Bangalore; no merits decided, no precedent engaged.

What did the court decide?

None on the merits; writ petition closed as infructuous with no costs and the connected miscellaneous petition (M.P.No.1 of 2010) closed, on counsel's submission and endorsement that the cause no longer survives. ¶24

Dr. Parimal Roy, Vs the Chairman — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 29155 of 2010

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶6

WP No. 29155 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010

Dr. Parimal Roy

..Petitioner(s)

The Chairman, Agricultural Services Recruitment Board (ASRB),

¶11

Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan, New Delhi-110012.

¶12

The Secretary, Agricultural Services Recruitment Board (ASRB), Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan, New Delhi-110012.

¶13

Dr.Divakar Hemadri, Principal Scientist, Project Directorate On Animal Disease Monitoring And Surveillance, Bangalore.

¶14

..Respondent(s)

¶15

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to award the allotted marks of 9 Marks to the petitioner for his academic qualifications as per the score card applicable to Advertisement No.03/2008 for the selection and appointment to the post of Principal Scientist, Project Directorate on Animal Disease Monitoring and Surveillance, Bangalore and thereby select and appoint the petitioner as Principal Scientist, Project Directorate on Animal Disease Monitoring and Surveillance, Bangalore by declaring the selection and appointment of the 3rd respondent as null and void.

¶16

__________ Page1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WP No. 29155 of 2010

¶19

For Petitioner(s):	Ms.V.Kaaviya for Mr.A.R.Suresh
For Respondent(s):	Ms.Y.Kavitha for R1 and R2 Government Advocate
	R3- Notice returned

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration by this Court any further and thus, the writ petition has become infructuous.

¶22