Arokiadoss Vs the Tahsildhar

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 st respondent herein to consider the petitioner’s representation/objection dated 05.01.2026 and to conduct a fair enquiry before initiating the survey and demarcation proceedings in the property situate at Survey No.190/5, measuring an extent of 0.1.66 ares, at Sathipattu Village, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.

¶16

Page No.1 of 7

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.2837 of 2026

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar

¶20

For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate [R1 & R2] Notice dispensed with [R3]

¶21

¶22

ORDER

¶23

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 1 st respondent to

¶24

consider the petitioner’s representation/objection dated 05.01.2026 and thereafter, to conduct a fair enquiry before initiating the survey and demarcation proceedings of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition.

¶25

2. Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts

¶26

notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. Since no adverse order has been passed against the 3 rd respondent in this writ petition, notice to the 3rd respondent is dispensed with.

¶27

3. Earlier, the neighbouring land owner, by name S.John @ John Peter, who is the 3 rd respondent herein, had filed a writ petition in W.P.No.46349 of 2025 and in the said writ petition, by order, dated

¶28

Page No.2 of 7

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.2837 of 2026

¶31

02.12.2025, this Court had directed the respondent therein to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the very same property, which is the subject of this writ petition. The only grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is that without hearing the petitioners’ objections, an attempt is being made by the official respondents to survey and demarcate the boundaries for the subject property. Hence, the petitioners seek for a direction to the 1 st respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation/objection, dated 05.01.2026 before surveying and demarcating the boundaries of the subject property as directed by this Court on dated 02.12.2025 passed in W.P.No.46349 of 2025.

¶32

4. Necessarily, the objections of the petitioners has to be heard and only thereafter, the official respondents can survey and demarcate the boundaries of the subject property, based on the request made by the 3 rd respondent.

¶33

5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 1 st respondent to consider the petitioners’ representation/objection dated 05.01.2026, before surveying and demarcating the boundaries of the property

¶34

Page No.3 of 7

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.No.2837 of 2026

¶37

morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, as directed by this

¶38

Court in its order, dated 02.12.2025 passed in W.P.No.46349 of 2025.

¶39

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶40

29.01.2026

¶41

Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp

¶42

Page No.4 of 7

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P.No.2837 of 2026

¶45

To