Dismissed¶34

C.R.Senthilkumar v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC5 Feb 2026WP/2019/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of writ petition as withdrawn; withdrawal memo dated 28.10.2025; endorsement by counsel; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed; writ of certiorarified mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; G.O.(D)No.77 Higher Education (H1) Department dated 27/05/2020; proceedings No.37095/A2/2016 dated 06/06/2020; Annamalai University; Director of Technical Education; Commissioner of Technical Education; State of Tamil Nadu Higher Education Department; C.R. Senthilkumar; T. Vinod Kumar J.; High Court of Judicature at Madras; 05-02-2026; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Recording the memo dated 28.10.2025 and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn; no issue of law was adjudicated. ¶34

C.R.Senthilkumar Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 2019 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05-02-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶6

WP No. 2019 of 2021

¶7

and W.M.P.Nos.2289,2287,23174 and 23177 of 2021

C.R.Senthilkumar

..Petitioner(s)

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education (II) Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶12

The Commissioner of Technical Eduction (F.A.C.), No.53, Sardar Patel Road, Bakthavatsalam Nagar, Guindy, Chennai 600 025.

¶13

The Registrar,

¶14

Annamalai University Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram 608 002.

¶15

The Director of Technical Education, NBo.53, Sardar Patel Rod, Bakthavatsalam Nagar, Gindy, Chennai 600 025.

¶16

..Respondent(s)

¶17

__________ Page1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

WP No. 2019 of 2021

¶20

Prayer : P etition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to

¶21

issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to c all for the records pertaining to G.O.(D)No.77 Higher Education (H1) Department dated 27/05/2020 issued by

¶22

the 1st respondent and the consequent proceedings No.37095/ A2 /2016, dated 06/06/2020 issued by the 4th respondent and quash the same and consequently

¶23

direct the respondents to post the petitioner in his Parent Department, Viz, 3rd respondent University.

¶24

For Petitioner(s): Ms. KAREN VANIA .S.

¶25

FOR M/S. P. WILSON ASSOCIATES

¶26

For Respondent(s): MR. VADIVELU DEENADAYALAN AGP FOR R- 1,2 AND 4 M/S. E.C. RAMESH FOR R3

¶27

ORDER

¶28

Ms.Karen Vania.S, learned counsel representing Mr.Richardson Wilson, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the writ petition and instructed to withdraw the writ petition.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that a memo dated 28.10.2025 has been filed seeking to withdraw the writ petition enclosing therewith a copy of the letter dated 15.10.2025 received from the petitioner. She also made an endorsement to that effect on the case bundle.

¶30

__________ Page2 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

WP No. 2019 of 2021

¶33