Dismissed¶23

C.Mohandass v. The Managing Director

Madras HC12 Mar 2026WP/19606/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; writ of Certiorarified Mandamus; Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd (TASMAC) - Managing Director, Senior Regional Manager (Salem), District Manager (Vellore); confirmation orders dated 09.09.2013, 18.12.2015 and 18.06.2019; reinstatement with back wages and continuity of service sought; no adjudication on merits; no costs; connected WMP.Nos.20897 & 20899 of 2021 closed; Justice Mohammed Shaffiq; decided 12-03-2026.

What the court decided

AI extract

C.Mohandass Vs The Managing Director — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 19606 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12-03-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ WP No. 19606 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.20897 & 20899 of 2021

¶6

C.Mohandass

¶7

S/o. K. Chinnasamy, D. No. 240, Kodakkal New Colony and Post, Sholinghur (Via), Walajapet Taluk, Vellore District - 631 105.

¶8

..Petitioner(s)

¶9

¶10

The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd, 4th Floor, C. M. D. A Tower - 2, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

¶11

The Senior Regional Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd, Salem.

¶12

The District Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd, Vellore.

¶13

..Respondent(s)

¶14

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.R1 / 2103 / 2019 dated 18.06.2019, passed by the 1st respondent confirming the orders in proceedings Se. Mu. No. 5646/2015/A dated 18.12.2015, passed by the 2nd Respondent, confirming the order in Proceedings No. Se. Mu. Na. Ka. A2 / 681 (II) /C.V / 2013 dated 09.09.2013, passed by the 3rd respondent, quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to reinstate the Petitioner in service with

¶15

Page1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

WP No. 19606 of 2021

¶18

back wages and continuity of services.

¶19

For Petitioner(s): M/s. S.Sairaman For Respondent(s): MR.K.Balakrishnan, Standing Counsel

¶20

ORDER

¶21

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel

¶22

appearing on behalf of petitioner made a submission that the writ petition has become infructuous and no further adjudication needs to be made in respect of the grounds raised in the writ petition.

¶23