Dismissed¶23

S.Saravanan v. Secretary to Government

Madras HC11 Mar 2026WP/15618/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Infructuous writ petition dismissed on counsel's endorsement; no further adjudication of grounds raised; Article 226 certiorari challenge to transfer order dated 13.05.2023 (Se. Mu. Order No. 000704 / NIR1 / 2023) transferring petitioner from Vellore to Tirunelveli; Differently Abled Welfare Department; Madras High Court; Mohammed Shaffiq, J.; no costs; connected WMP Nos. 15111 and 15112 of 2023 closed; decision dated 11-03-2026.

What did the court decide?

Recording the petitioner's counsel's endorsement that the writ petition had become infructuous and that no further adjudication was required on the grounds raised, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. ¶23

S.Saravanan Vs Secretary to Government — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 15618 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11-03-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

WP No. 15618 of 2023 and WMP Nos.15111 and 15112 of 2023

¶7

S.Saravanan

¶8

S/o.D.Subramani, No.3/37, Balaji Koil Street, Sevoor Village and Post, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore District 632 106.

¶9

..Petitioner(s)

¶10

¶11

Secretary to Government Differently Abled Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

¶12

Commissioner of Differently Abled Welfare, Chennai 600 005.

¶13

..Respondent(s)

¶14

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records concerned relating to the order dated 13.05.2023 issued by the 2nd respondent in Se. Mu. Order No. 000704 / NIR1 / 2023 in so far as the petitioner is concerned, transferring the petitioner from Vellore to Tirunelveli and quash the same

¶15

For Petitioner(s): Mr. M.Gnanasekar

¶16

For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Jeevagiridharan Additional Government Pleader

¶17

__________ Page1 of 3

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

WP No. 15618 of 2023

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that

¶22

the writ petition has become infructuous and no further adjudication needs to be made in respect of the grounds raised in the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶23

2. Recording the same, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

¶24

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶25

11-03-2026

¶26

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶27

¶28

¶29