Disposed¶38

A.P.Christal v. The district Collector

Madras HC8 Jun 2026WP/18877/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, WP No. 18877 of 2026, Krishnan Ramasamy J., decided 08-06-2026. Keywords: writ of mandamus; Article 226; consideration of representation dated 01.08.2025; issuance of patta; survey request; Survey No.317/3 Ponniyamman Nagar Idayanchavadi Village; 1449 sq.ft. Plot No.29; District Collector Chennai; Revenue Divisional Officer Redhills; Tahsildar Thiruvottiyur Taluk; larger extent vs smaller extent mismatch; missing title documents; fresh representation with documents; disposal on merits without cost. No precedents cited; no dissent.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with directions: petitioner to submit a fresh representation with all relevant title documents; respondent to consider it and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law; no cost. ¶38

A.P.Christal Vs The district Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶38

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents can be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.08.2025 seeking survey/issuance of patta for the property in Survey No.317/3, Ponniyamman Nagar, Idayanchavadi Village.

¶22

Ratio / Principle

Since the petitioner's representation was made for a larger extent of land while the present petition seeks only the smaller extent, and the relevant documents were not filed along with the representation, no direction can be issued to the official respondents to consider the same.

¶33

Key takeaways

The petitioner is directed to file a proper fresh representation before the respondent along with all the relevant documents to establish title over the property; upon receipt, the respondent shall consider it and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law.ratio¶34

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court (Krishnan Ramasamy J.), WP No. 18877 of 2026, disposed 08-06-2026. A writ petition under Article 226 sought a Mandamus directing the District Collector, Chennai District to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.08.2025 for issuance of Patta for land in Survey No.317/3, Ponniyamman Nagar, Idayanchavadi Village, measuring 1449 sq.ft., Plot No.29. Government counsel pointed out that the representation actually covered survey of Survey Nos.317/3, 317/3c, 323 and 322/1 - a larger extent than the smaller extent claimed in the petition - and that no relevant documents substantiating the petitioner's title were produced with it. Holding that in such circumstances no direction to consider the representation could be issued, the Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with all relevant title documents, upon which the respondent shall pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. Petition disposed of without cost.

¶1

WP No. 18877 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 08-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 18877 of 2026

¶6

A.P.Christal W/o.Thangamani, Residing at No.66/47, Manali New Town, Chennai- 600 103.

¶7

..Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

The District Collector Chennai District.

¶10

The Revenue Divisional Officer Redhills Division, Chennai District.

¶11

The Tahsildar Thiruvottiyur Taluk, Chennai District- 019.

¶12

..Respondent(s)

¶13

Prayer:

¶14

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to Consider and dispose of the Petitioner representation dated 01.08.2025 and seeking issuance of Patta for the property situated in Survey No.317/3, Ponniyamman Nagar, Idayanchavadi Villag, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvottiyur, Thiruallur District, measuring an extent of 1449 Sq.ft, in Plot No.29. within a time frame as fixed by this Honble court.

¶15

For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Thenrajan

¶16

For Respondent(s):

¶17

Mr.M.Guruprasad, Govt’s counsel

¶18

Page1 of 5

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

WP No. 18877 of 2026

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.08.2025.

¶23

Mr.M.Guruprasad, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶24

By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶25

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation before the respondent, requesting to conduct the survey at the subject property. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.

¶26

In reply, the learned Government's counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that the subject property in this petition is only the property at Survey No.317/3. However, the petitioner's representation was filed for conducting survey at the properties situated at Survey Nos.317/3, 317/3c, 323, 322/1. However, no relevant documents, to substantiate the title of the petitioner over the said properties, was produced before the respondent. Hence,

¶27

Page2 of 5

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

WP No. 18877 of 2026

¶30

she would submit that if a fresh representation is made along with all the relevant documents, the same will be duly considered by the respondent. Therefore, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

¶31

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents and

¶32

also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶33

In the case on hand, upon perusal of the petitioner's representation, it appears that the petitioner's representation was made for larger extent of land, however, the present petition is filed only for the smaller extent. Further, it was submitted by the respondents that the relevant documents were not filed along with the said representation. In such case, no direction can be issued to the official respondents to consider the same.

¶34

In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to file a proper fresh representation before the respondent, along with all the relevant documents to established his title over the property. Upon receipt of the same, the respondent shall consider it and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law.

¶35

__________ Page3 of 5

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

WP No. 18877 of 2026

¶38