U.Vignesh Vs The State

¶1

W.P.No.1519 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 29.06.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.1519 of 2019 and

¶7

WMP.Nos.1681 & 1683 of 2019

¶8

U.Vignesh, S/o. Mr.R.Uthirapathi, 70, Sannathi Street, Thiruppanandal, Thanjavur District Presently residing at AP 739, 2^nd Street, 11^th Main Road, G-Block, Anna Nagar West, Chennai – 600 040.

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

vs

¶11

The State Represented by its Principal Secretary, Welfare of Differently Abled Persons (DAP.3.2.) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶12

The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶13

The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Rep. By its Secretary, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.

¶14

… Respondents

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.1519 of 2019

¶18

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

¶19

praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent to modify the Vacancy/Reservation by including 3% quota for Person with Disability (PWD) in its Notification Advertisement No.19/2016 dated 09.11.2016 for Group-I Services Examination

¶20

a) In line with Clause 6 (F) of the Notification 19/2016 dated 09.11.2016 published by second respondent.

¶21

b) In line with Clause 6 (ii) Page No.14 (Other Conditions) of the “Instruction to Applicants” published by the second respondent.

¶22

c) In line with G.O.(Ms).No.13 dated 02.03.2016 published by the first respondent.

¶23

d) In line with Section 33 of the Persons With Disabilities Act, 1995.

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.Akhil Yashwanth for Mr.G.Thyagarajan

¶25

For Respondents : Mrs.Y.Kavitha Government Counsel for R1 & R2 : Mr.I.Abrar Md. Abdullah Standing Counsel for R3

¶26

O R D E R

¶27

Mr.Akhil Yashwanth, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits

¶28

that subsequent to the filing of the present writ petition, the petitioner has joined some other service. As such, the cause in the writ petition does not

¶29

2/4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.No.1519 of 2019

¶32

survive for consideration and thus, the writ petition has become infructuous and also made an endorsement in the bundle to the above effect.

¶33

In view of the aforesaid submission and the endorsement made by

¶34

the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

¶35

29.06.2026

¶36

Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No dh

¶37

To

¶38