G.R.Ananthapadmaabhan v. State of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous dismissal of two Article 226 writ petitions (WP Nos. 1116 and 1119 of 2019) by the Madras High Court (M. Dhandapani, J., 04-06-2026). Relief sought: mandamus (a) restraining respondents from interfering with petitioner's possession of S.No.90/2, 90/2A, 90/2B, Nerkundram Village, Purasaivakkam Taluk, Chennai District, and (b) directing restoration of the property by installing compound wall and/or fencing. Respondents: State of Tamil Nadu (Housing and Urban Development Department), Member Secretary CMDA, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, District Revenue Officer-cum Chief Administrator (CCCBT CMDA Omni Bus Stand, Koyambedu), Rajendran (no appearance), Inspector of Police K-10 Koyambedu Police Station. Petitioner's counsel: R. Parthasarathy; Government Counsel: P. Siddarth (R1, R3, R4, R6), P. Veena Suresh (R2). Ground: 4th respondent vacated premises during pendency; petitioner in possession. Result: dismissed as infructuous, no costs; WMP No. 1269 of 2019 closed.