Dismissed¶25

S.Sathish Srinivas v. State Of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC5 Jan 2026WA/3876/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court Division Bench (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, CJ and G. Arul Murugan, J.) - W.A.No.3876 of 2025 and C.M.P.Nos.31666 and 31669 of 2025; appellant S. Sathish Srinivas v. State of Tamil Nadu, Director DME&R and Secretary, Selection Committee; appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against Single Judge order dated 17.11.2025 in W.P.No.43387 of 2025; dismissed as withdrawn at appellant's request; no order as to costs; interim applications closed; decided 05.01.2026; no issues decided, no holdings, no cases cited.

What the court decided

AI extract

S.Sathish Srinivas Vs State Of Tamil Nadu — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.A.No.3876 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05.01.2026

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN

¶7

W.A.No.3876 of 2025 and C.M.P.Nos.31666 and 31669 of 2025

¶8

S.Sathish Srinivas S/o.A.Suresh Kumar, No.18/37, Muthulakshmi Street, Lakshmipuram, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai - 600 041.

¶9

Appellant

¶10

¶11

1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department (MCA1) Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶12

2.The Director

¶13

Directorate of Medical Education and Research, No.162, Periyar EVR High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.

¶14

3.The Secretary, Selection Committee, Directorate of Medical Education and Research, No.162, Periyar EVR High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.

¶15

Respondents

¶16

_______________ Page 1 of 4_

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the

¶19

W.A.No.3876 of 2025

¶20

PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 17.11.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.43387 of 2025.

¶21

For Appellant: M/s.L.Jyothy For Mr.R.S.Anandan

¶22

For Respondents: Mr.E.Vijay Anand Addl. Government Pleader

¶23

JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶24

Learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal.

¶25

In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interim applications stand closed.

¶26

(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)