P.Saravana Kumar v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissed as vague: Madras HC WP No.50236 of 2025 (05.01.2026; Manindra Mohan Shrivastava CJ, G. Arul Murugan J.). Article 226 mandamus by a co-lane resident seeking removal of alleged unauthorized construction at Door No.117/53, Maddox Street, Choolai, Chennai, via action by Greater Chennai Corporation (Commissioner and Zonal Officer Zone-V) on CMDA Letter No.EC/N-I/E-1622831/2025 dated 10.12.2025; petition filed without impleading the building owner; held vague, cannot be taken cognizance of; dismissed, no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
The Court observed that the petition had been filed without impleading the owner of the building alleged to have made the illegal construction, the petitioner claiming to be a resident of one accommodation of the same lane. ¶23