Dismissed¶17

Abdul Rahim v. Sarojini Paul

Madras HC20 Feb 2026SA(MD)/928/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of Second Appeal; S.A.(MD)No.928/2009; CMP.(MD).No.14085/2025; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; N. Mala J.; decision 20.02.2026; appellants Abdul Rahim, Liyakath Ali, Kaliludheen (counsel T. Antony Arulraj); respondents Sarojini Paul (counsel R. Anbarasu), Ayisha, Rajiya Beevi, J. Shajathi, Palanichamy; Section 100 CPC; AS.No.38/2005 Subordinate Judge Tiruchirappalli 11.04.2008; OS.No.145/1995 District Munsif Manapparai 30.10.2001; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

What did the court decide?

Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the appellants' counsel (supported by letter dated 29.01.2026 to the Registry); no costs; connected miscellaneous petition CMP.(MD).No.14085/2025 closed. ¶17

Abdul Rahim Vs Sarojini Paul — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SA.(MD).No.928/2009

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 20.02.2026

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA

¶5

S.A.(MD)No.928/2009 & CMP.(MD).No.14085/2025

¶6

1.Abdul Rahim 2.Liyakath Ali 3.Kaliludheen

¶7

. . Appellants

¶8

Versus

¶9

1.Sarojini Paul 2.Ayisha 3.Rajiya Beevi 4.J.Shajathi 5.Palanichamy . . Respondents

¶10

Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC, against the judgment and decree dated11.04.2008 made in AS.No.38/2005 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2001 made in OS.No.145/1995, on the file of the District Munsif, Manapparai.

¶11

For Appellants	: Mr.T.Antony Arulraj
For R1	: Mr.R.Anbarasu
RR2 to 4	: Dismissed
For R5	; No appearance

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

SA.(MD).No.928/2009

¶14

(1)The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to

¶15

JUDGMENT

¶16

(1)The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Second Appeal. He has also circulated a letter dated 29.01.2026 to the Registry to that effect.

¶17

(2)In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants and recording the Letter dated 29.01.2026, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶18

20.02.2026

¶19

AP Internet : Yes

¶20