Dismissed¶24

Chinnadurai v. Helena Selvaranjani

Madras HC20 Feb 2026SA(MD)/384/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution of three second appeals (SA.(MD).Nos.384, 385 & 386/2010), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, N. Mala J., 20.02.2026; appeals under Section 100 CPC against common judgment and decree dated 30.06.2009 in AS.No.43, 40 & 41/2007 (I Additional Subordinate Judge, Trichy) confirming orders dated 10.11.2006 in OS.Nos.1401/2004, 2513/1993 and 627/1996 (Principal District Munsif, Trichy); no appearance by appellants on 12.02.2026 and 20.02.2026; dismissed with no costs; appellants Chinnadurai and Vairamani Ammal/Vairamani; respondents include Helena Selvaranjani, Simon Prem Kumar, Pon Amaravathi, Govindasamy, District Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchirappalli.

What did the court decide?

None; the Second Appeals were dismissed for non-prosecution and no costs were awarded. ¶24

Chinnadurai Vs Helena Selvaranjani — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SA.(MD).Nos.384, 385 & 386/2010

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED 20.02.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA

¶6

S.A.(MD)Nos.384, 385 & 386/2010

¶7

1.Chinnadurai 2.Vairamani Ammal . . Appellants in SA.(MD).Nos.384 & 386/2010 1.Vairamani 2.Chinnadurai . . Appellant in SA.(MD).No.385/2010

¶8

Versus 1.Helena Selvaranjani 2.Simon Prem Kumar 3.Pon Amaravathi 4.Govindasamy . . Respondents in SA. (MD).No.384/2010 1.Kaliyaperumal [Died] 2.Vedamanickam [Died] 3.Pon Amaravathi **R1 died and there is no need to implead his LR R3 is recorded as LR of the deceased R2 vide order dated 08.10.2012 made in SA.(MD).No.385/2010 . . Respondents in SA. (MD).No.385/2010

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶10

SA.(MD).Nos.384, 385 & 386/2010

¶11

1.The District Collector Collectorate, Cantonment Tiruchirappalli-1.

¶12

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Collectorate, Cantonment Tiruchirappalli-1.

¶13

3.Helena Selvaranjani 4.Simon Prem Kumar 5.Pon Amaravathi

¶14

. . Respondents in SA.(MD).No.386/2010

¶15

Common Prayer:- Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of CPC, against the common judgment and decree dated 30.06.2009 in AS.No.43, 40 & 41/2007 on the file of the learned I Additional Subordinate Judge, Trichy, confirming the order dated 10.11.2006 in OS.Nos.1401/2004, 2513/1993 and 627/1996, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Trichy.

¶16

For Appellants in all the appeals :	No appearance
For RR 1 to 3 in
SA.(MD).No.385/10:	Mr.D.Rajkumar R4-Dismissed
For R3 in SA.(MD)
No.385/2010 :	Mr.D.Rajkumar
For RR 1 & 2 in
SA.(MD).No.386/10 :	Mr.F.Deepak, AGP
For RR3 to R5 :	Mr.D.Rajkumar

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

SA.(MD).Nos.384, 385 & 386/2010

¶19

(1)When the matter was taken up on 12.02.2026, there was no representation

¶20

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶21

(1)When the matter was taken up on 12.02.2026, there was no representation

¶22

for the appellants. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption ''for Dismissal'' today [20.02.2026].

¶23

(2)Even today, there is no representation for the appellants and therefore, it is inferred that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the Second Appeals.

¶24