Dismissed¶36

Subbiah Nadar @ Subramanian v. Thangavel

Madras HC13 Feb 2026SA(MD)/514/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed-as-not-pressed second appeal under Section 100 C.P.C.; Subbaiah Nadar @ Subramanian and Thangaraj v. Thangavel and others (including Panchayat Board, Mela Ilanthaikulam Village, and the Tahsildar, Sankarankovil); S.A.(MD)No.514 of 2014, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 13.02.2026 by K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.; challenged A.S.No.79 of 2011 decree of Sub Court, Sankarankovil dated 18.11.2013 modifying O.S.No.61 of 2009 decree of Additional District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil dated 23.02.2011; third respondent dead, no steps taken; no merits decided; connected C.M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 closed; no costs.

What the court decided

Subbiah Nadar @ Subramanian Vs Thangavel — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.(MD)No.514 of 2014

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATE : 13.02.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

S.A(MD)No.514 of 2014 and C.M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014

¶7

1.Subbaiah Nadar @ Subramanian

2.Thangaraj

: Appellants

Vs.

1.Thangavel

¶12

2.Suriya Narayanan

¶13

3.Madasamy

¶14

4.Natarajan

¶15

5.Dharmalingam

¶16

6.Thangapandian

¶17

7.Shanmugasundaram

¶18

8.Panchayat Board, Mela Ilanthaikulam Village, through its President, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶19

9.The Tahsildar, Sankarankovil, Office at Sankarankovil Town, Sankarankvoil, Tirunelveli. : Respondents

¶20

1/4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

S.A.(MD)No.514 of 2014

¶23

PRAYER:- Appeal Suit filed under Section 100 C.P.C., to set aside the judgment and decree of the appellate Court, dated 18.11.2013 passed in A.S.No.79 of 2011 on the file Sub Court, Sankarankovil, modifying the judgment and decree, dated 23.02.2011 passed in O.S.No.61 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil.

¶24

For Appellants : Mr.F.X.Eugene For Respondents : Mr.R.T.Aravind Kumar, for R1, R2 and R4 to R7.

¶25

: Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, for R6.

¶26

: Mr.D.Gandhi Raj, Special Government Pleader, for 9.

¶27

J U D G M E N T

¶28

The Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree, dated

¶29

18.11.2013 passed in A.S.No.79 of 2011 on the file Sub Court, Sankarankovil, modifying the judgment and decree, dated 23.02.2011 passed in O.S.No.61 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil.

¶30

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the third respondent died and the appellant has not taken steps. Moreover, the learned counsel would

¶31

2/4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

S.A.(MD)No.514 of 2014

¶34

further submit that the appellant is not pressing the appeal and also made an

¶35

endorsement to that effect.

¶36