Arulmigu Irudayaleswarar v. Jayammal
Case brief
What is this about?
S.A.No.644 of 2014; High Court of Judicature at Madras; Dr. Justice A.D. Maria Clete; dismissed for non-prosecution; no representation for appellant; Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code; appellant Arulmigu Irudayaleswarar Thirukoil, Thiruninravur; respondent Jayammal; A.S.No.84 of 2012 (Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee); O.S.No.148 of 2004 (Additional District Munsif, Poonamallee); no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What did the court decide?
It is clear and evident that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the Second Appeal, as there was no representation for the appellant when the matter was called on 09.02.2026 and again on 10.02.2026. ¶17