Dismissed
Poungody v. Parangusam
Madras HCSA/1259/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Second appeals against concurrent decrees in property suits were dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on two consecutive listings.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A.Nos.1259, 1260, 1261 & 1262 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶2
DATED: 10.02.2026
¶3
CORAM
¶4
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE
¶5
S.A.Nos.1259, 1260, 1261 & 1262 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 in S.A.No.1260 of 2013 M.P.No.1 of 2015 & S.A.No.1261 of 2013
¶6
Poungody
¶7
... Appellant
¶8
Vs
¶9
- Parangusam
¶10
Jayaram Chettiar (died)
¶11
- Saravanan
¶12
- Murugan
¶13
- Sundaresh Kumar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Poungody
- respondent
Parangusam Jayaram Chettiar (died)
- respondent
Saravanan
- respondent
Murugan
- respondent
Sundaresh Kumar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court