Dismissed¶26

K.B.Chandraseara Reddiar v. N.Jayaraj

Madras HC11 Feb 2026SA/357/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, SA No. 357 of 2010, Mummineni Sudheer Kumar J., 11-02-2026: second appeal by K.B.Chandraseara Reddiar against respondents N.Jayaraj, Kannabiran, Venkataraman, Gopalsamy and Palani dismissed for non-prosecution after repeated no-appearance; appeal targeted A.S.No.130 of 2005 (Chengalapattu) which modified O.S.No.336/1993 decree (Tambaram); no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed; no advocates appeared for either side.

What did the court decide?

The second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, there being no representation for the appellant despite the matter being passed over and called twice. ¶26

K.B.Chandraseara Reddiar Vs N.Jayaraj — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SA No. 357 of 2010

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11-02-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶6

SA No. 357 of 2010

¶7

K.B.Chandraseara Reddiar

¶8

..Appellant(s)

¶9

¶10

N.Jayaraj

¶11

Kannabiran

¶12

Venkataraman

¶13

Gopalsamy

¶14

Palani

¶15

..Respondent(s)

¶16

Prayer

¶17

To set aside the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.130 of 2005 dated 31.10.2008

¶18

on the file of the learned Principal Sub Judge, Chengalapattu, modifying the decree and judgemnent in O.S.No.336/1993 dated 28.07.2005 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Tambaram.

¶19

For Appellant(s):	No apperance
For Respondent(s):	No appearance

¶20

Page1 of 4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

SA No. 357 of 2010

¶23

JUDGMENT

¶24

This matter earlier came up for consideration before this court on 31.10.2025. As there was no representation for the appellant, the same was directed to be listed under the caption "For Dismissal".

¶25

Today, inspite of the matter being listed under the caption "For Dismissal", there is no appearance for the appellant. This matter was passed over and the same was again called at 12.00 noon. Inspite of the same, there is no representation for the appellant, leaving this court with no other option except to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.

¶26