Elangamani Vs Rangapandian

To set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.02.2008 made in A.S.No.5 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu, in confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.09.2003 made in O.S.No.306 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu.

¶17

For Appellant(s): M/s.A.B.Reeha Begum for Mr.T.Rajaraman For Respondent(s): M/s.P.T.Ramadevi (For R1) Mr.A.Amal Raj (For R2) M/s.K.Aswini Devi, Additional Government Pleader (For R3

¶18

__________ Page1 of 4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

SA No. 1349 of 2008

¶21

SA No. 1349 of 2008

Elangamani

..Appellant(s)

Vs

Rangapandian

..Respondent(s)

Prayer

To set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.02.2008 made in A.S.No.78 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu, in confirming the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2004 made in O.S.No.363 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu.

¶29

For Appellant(s):	M/s.A.B.Reeha Begum for Mr.T.Rajaraman
For Respondent(s):	M/s.P.T.Ramadevi

¶30

SA No. 1350 of 2008
Elangamani
1. Rangapandian 2. Selvakumar

..Appellant(s) Vs

..Respondent(s)

Prayer

To set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.02.2008 made in A.S.No.79 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu, in confirming the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2004 made in O.S.No.573 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu.

¶35

For Appellant(s): M/s.A.B.Reeha Begum for Mr.T.Rajaraman For Respondent(s): M/s.P.T.Ramadevi

¶36

__________ Page2 of 4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

SA No. 1349 of 2008

¶39

COMMON ORDER

¶40

It is reported by the learned counsel for the appellants that the sole appellant passed away long back and, inspite of his best efforts, he is not in a position to reach the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant and has expressed his inability to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant.

¶41

In the circumstances, this court is left with no other option except to dismiss these three second appeals as abated. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed as abated consequent upon the death of the sole appellant. However, it is made clear that, in case if the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant intend to pursue the appeals, they are at liberty to file appropriate applications. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

11-02-2026

skr

To

The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Guduvancherry, Chengalpattu Taluk

¶46

__________ Page3 of 4

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis