Dismissed
M.K.Marimuthu v. E.M.Manickam
Madras HCSA/2187/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a second appeal under Section 100 CPC for non-prosecution, as neither the appellant nor respondents appeared before the court on the dates of hearing.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
SA No. 2187 of 2004
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED: 28-04-2026
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
¶6
SA No. 2187 of 2004 AND CMP NO. 18996 OF 2004
¶7
M.K.Marimuthu
¶8
..Appellant/ Appellant/1st defendant
¶9
Vs
¶10
- E.M.Manickam 2. N.Nachimuthu
¶11
- P.Seerangammal
¶12
- M.Vivekananthan
¶13
5. D.Sivakami
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
M.K. Marimuthu
- respondent
E.M. Manickam
- respondent
N. Nachimuthu
- respondent
P. Seerangammal
- respondent
M. Vivekananthan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court