Allowed¶37

Mohanambal v. Chellammal

Madras HC29 Apr 2026CMP/9154/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

condonation of delay; 718 days; Section 5 of Limitation Act; restoration petition; S.A.No.562 of 2004; C.M.P.No.9154 of 2026; Second Appeal dismissed on 12.01.2024 against Respondents 1, 2, 3 & 5; Madras High Court; R. Sakthivel, J.; no objection by counsel for Respondents 4 & 6; matter to be listed 01.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the delay of 718 days in filing the restoration petition in S.A.No.562 of 2004; Registry directed to number the restoration petition, if otherwise in order, and list it for hearing on 01.06.2026. ¶37

Mohanambal Vs Chellammal — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

C.M.P.No.9154 of 2026 in S.A.No.562 of 2004

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 29.04.2026

¶4

Coram: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL

¶5

C.M.P.No.9154 of 2026 in S.A.No.562 of 2004

¶6

Mohanambal

¶7

W/o. Govindasamy Permabalur,

Trichy District.

...Petitioner

Versus

1.Chellammal (Died) W/o. Natesan Pillai

¶12

2.Muthiah Pillai (Died) S/o. Natesan Pillai

¶13

3.Dhanabal (Died) S/o. Natesan Pillai

¶14

4.Ponmalar D/o. Natesan Pillai

¶15

5.Umesh (Died) D/o. Natesan Pillai

¶16

6.Kannagambujam D/o. Natesan Pillai

¶17

All are residing at Stamp Vendor Street, Trichy District.

¶18

...Respondents

¶19

1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

C.M.P.No.9154 of 2026 in S.A.No.562 of 2004

¶22

Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of 718 days in filing the restoration petition in S.A.No.562 of 2004 with respect of Respondents 1, 2, 3 and 5 which was dismissal on 12.01.2024.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sathish Kumar for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For Respondents – 4 & 6 : Ms.A.Nilaphar for Ms.R.Meenal

¶24

ORDER

¶25

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of

¶26

Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 718 days in filing the restoration petition seeking to restore S.A.No.562 of 2004 which was dismissed as against the Respondents 1, 2, 3 & 5 on 12.01.2024.

¶27

Heard Mr.R.Sathish Kumar, Counsel representing

¶28

M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates, Counsel on record for the

¶29

Petitioner/Appellant and Ms.A.Nilaphar, Counsel representing Ms.R.Meenal, Counsel on record for the Respondents 4 & 6.

¶30

Representing Counsel for the Respondents 4 & 6 submitted that

¶31

the Counsel on record has no objection for this petition being allowed.

¶32

2/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

C.M.P.No.9154 of 2026 in S.A.No.562 of 2004

¶35

This Court has perused the case files.

¶36

Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in

¶37

support of this petition and with a view to decide the matter on merits, this Court is inclined to allow this petition. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered accordingly.

¶38