Disposed

Thirumalaikumar S v. The Management of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC25 Jun 2026REV.APLW(MD)/134/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review application against an earlier writ order concerning payment of full pension and interest on belated terminal benefits. The court declined to review and instead granted the applicant liberty to file a fresh writ petition or other proceedings to claim interest, disposing of the review without costs.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition or initiate other proceedings to claim interest on belated settlement of benefits.

Thirumalaikumar S Vs The Management of Tamil… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

Rev.Apl.W(MD)No.134 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 25.06.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

Rev.Apl.W.(MD)No.134 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.7470 of 2023

S.Thirumalaikumar

... Petitioner

1.The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd.,

¶11

Represented by its Managing Director, Madurai.

¶12

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Virudhunagar Region, Virudhunagar.

¶13

3.The Administrator,

¶14

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 02. ... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Review Application is filed under Order XLVII, Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code r/w. Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code, to review the order passed by this Court dated 27.06.2023 in W.P.No.7470 of 2023 passed by this Court insofar as not issuing direction to pay the petitioner, full monthly pension, and other retirements benefits together

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Rev.Apl.W(MD)No.134 of 2025

¶19

with interest at 6% per annum for the belated payment of terminal benefits and insofar as fixing a time frame for settlement of the aforesaid terminal benefits.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh,

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

The review applicant is given liberty to file a fresh writ petition

¶23

or initiate another proceedings to claim interest on belated settlement of his benefits.

¶24

2.With the aforesaid liberty to the review applicant, this writ

¶25

petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶26

25.06.2026

¶27

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶28

2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

Rev.Apl.W(MD)No.134 of 2025

¶31

3/4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Rev.Apl.W(MD)No.134 of 2025

¶34

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶35

ias

¶36

Rev.Apl.W.(MD)No.134 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.7470 of 2023

¶37

25.06.2026 (1/2)

¶38

4/4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Thirumalaikumar S v. The Management of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thirumalaikumar S v. The Management of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kachamma Naicker (Died),1. Krishnammal, Vs 1. Akkammal (Died), 2. S.M.Jayabalan (Died), 3. Duraisamy

S. Sathyamoorthi, Vs Amutha I.A.S.

K.Murugan Vs Ayyanar

Poongundran @ Ganesan Vs M.Jeyachandran

Varadharajan Vs P.Kalaiyarasi

M.Vaidhialingam Vs The Management of Tamil Nadu