K.Murugan v. Ayyanar
Case brief
What is this about?
In this non-speaking order, the Madras High Court noted that the direction given in a previous writ petition had been complied with by the respondent Tahsildar. Consequently, the contempt petition was closed without further adjudication.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT P(MD) No. 1655 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15-06-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
CONT P(MD) No. 1655 of 2026
K.Murugan S/o.P.Karuvelan, 10/48, North Street, Muppulivetti, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
Ayyanar Thasildar, Talukk Office, Ottapidaram, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District.
..Respondent(s)
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to initiate Contempt proceedings against the Contemnor / 1st Respondent and punish him for the willful disobedience of the order of this Honourale Court passed in W.P.(MD)No.26227 of 2023 dated 02.11.2023 and thus render justice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Murugan
- respondent
Ayyanar Thasildar
Coram
G.R. Swaminathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court