Dismissed¶28

A.Rathinasami, v. Mr. K.Jeeva

Madras HC19 Jan 2026REV.APLW/1/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review application dismissed as withdrawn; A.Rathinasami v. L.Jeeva, District Collector & Tahsildar (Cuddalore), Assistant Engineer (State Highways), Executive Engineer (TNEB) and Vallaiutham; Review Appln.(Writ) No.1 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.413 of 2026; High Court of Judicature at Madras; decided 19.01.2026 by S.M.Subramaniam, J. with C.Kumarappan, J.; sought review of order dated 20.09.2021 in W.P.No.20014 of 2021; filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure; advocates: D.Baskar for petitioner, T.Arun Kumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R2 to R5; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Review Application dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request; no costs imposed; connected miscellaneous petition W.M.P.No.413 of 2026 closed. ¶28

A.Rathinasami, Vs Mr. K.Jeeva — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Review Appln.(Writ).No.1 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.01.2026

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶5

Review Appln. (Writ) No.1 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.413 of 2026 and

A.Rathinasami

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.L.Jeeva

2.The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu.

¶11

3.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chidambaram Taluk, Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu.

¶12

4.The Assistant Engineer, (Construction & Maintenance), State Highways, Highways Department, Sirkazhi Main Road, Chidambaram – 608 001. Tamil Nadu.

¶13

5.The Executive Engineer,

¶14

(Construction & Operation), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu.

6.Vallaiutham

...Respondents

Page No.:1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Review Appln.(Writ).No.1 of 2026

¶20

--------------------------------------------- PRAYER: This Review Application has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to review the order dated 20.09.2021 made in W.P.No.20014 of 2021.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Baskar For Respondents : Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R2 to R5

¶22

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

¶25

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw

¶26

this Review Application and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶27

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned

¶28

counsel for the petitioner, this Review Application is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶29

(S.M.S., J.) (C.K., J.) 19.01.2026

¶30

dsa Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No ----------------

¶31

Page No.:2/4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Review Appln.(Writ).No.1 of 2026

¶34

To: