Minors of Vasudha v. Anuradha Gopal
Case brief
What is this about?
OP No. 180 of 2017, High Court of Judicature at Madras, decided 27-04-2026 by Dr. Justice A.D. Maria Clete. Custody/guardianship petition under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 with Order XXI Rules 2 and 3 of Original Side Rules. Petitioner T.V. Vijayaraghavan (counsel Mr. B. Pachaiyappan) sought permanent custody of minors Vasudha Vijayaraghavan and Rohan Vijayaraghavan from respondent Anuradha Gopal. Petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission and endorsement that parties reunited living together; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition, if any, closed. Keywords: dismissed as infructuous, endorsement, reunited parents, permanent custody, minors, Guardians and Wards Act.
What did the court decide?
In view of the endorsement and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the parties have reunited living together and the matter has become infructuous, this Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.