Application to revoke a probate granted in 2004 was dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear on two successive listings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A No. 3586 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27-04-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE
A No. 3586 of 2024 in O.P.No.471 of 2001
Rakesh Kumar Golecha
..Applicant(s)
Vs
..Respondent(s)
Prayer : Application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules r/w. Order 263 of Indian Succession Act, praying to pass an order to revoke the Probate dated 30.04.2004 in O.P.No.471 of 2001.
For Applicant : No appearance For Respondents: Mr.S.Ramesh Kumar for D-10
__________ Page1 of 3
A No. 3586 of 2024
ORDER
When this matter was listed on 21.04.2026, there was no representation
for the applicant and hence, this case was directed to be listed under the caption
'For Dismissal' today. Even today, there is no representation for the applicant.
2.Hence, this application is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
costs.
27-04-2026
Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No
SRM
__________ Page2 of 3
A No. 3586 of 2024
DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.
SRM
A No. 3586 of 2024 in O.P.No.471 of 2001
27-04-2026
__________ Page3 of 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakesh Kumar Golecha
Sohanrajji Zamad
Devaraj Bohra
Gudarmal Taleda
Parasmal Khiwansara
Kishanlal Ranka
A.D.Maria Clete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
