Disposed¶43

M. Jaiganesh v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC6 Feb 2026HCP/224/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: habeas corpus; HCP No. 224 of 2026; Madras High Court; Article 226 Constitution of India; illegal custody; detenue produced; Tmt.Naveena Sri; free consent to marriage; threat and coercion; CSR.No.24 of 2026; missing wife 12.01.2026; Dharmapuri police; Mathikonpalayam Police Station; Superintendent of Police; private respondents 4 to 6; petition closed; remedy in manner known to law; P. Velmurugan J.; M. Jothisiraman J.; 06-02-2026.

What did the court decide?

The detenue Tmt.Naveena Sri was produced before the Court; as she stated she was not under any illegal custody at present, the petition was closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. ¶43

M. Jaiganesh Vs The Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

HCP No. 224 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 06-02-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

¶8

HCP No. 224 of 2026

¶9

M. Jaiganesh S/o.Late. Madhaiyan, No.3/98, Mariamman Kovil Street, Periyampatti Post, Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

¶10

..Petitioner(s)

¶11

¶12

The Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri,

¶13

Dharmapuri District.

¶14

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District.

¶15

The Inspector of Police, Mathikonpalayam Police Station, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District.

¶16

__________ Page1 of 6

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

HCP No. 224 of 2026

¶19

Tamilselvan

¶20

S/o. Govindan,

¶21

Advocate, Treasurer, Thirukoilur Bar Association, Combined Court Buildings, Tirukoilur, Asanur Road, Sandapet, Thirukoilur - 605 766, Villupuram District.

¶22

Selvam

¶23

S/o.Jeyaraman, Residing at No.19, JRS Nagar Unnamalai Chetty Chavadi, Kondur Post, Cuddalore - 607 002.

¶24

Thamaraimeimalar W/o.Selvam, Residing at No.19, JRS Nagar Unnamalai Chetty Chavadi, Kondur Post, Cuddalore - 607 002.

¶25

..Respondent(s)

¶26

Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 produce the petitioner’s wife namely Tmt.Naveena Sri (aged 22 years) before this Court and set her at liberty for the illegal custody of the respondents 4 to 6.

¶27

__________ Page2 of 6

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

HCP No. 224 of 2026

¶30

For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Elangovan For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Karthikeyan for R1 to R3 Mr.P.Vasanth for R5 and R6

¶31

ORDER

¶32

(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN J.)

¶33

When the petitioner’s wife went missing on 12.01.2026, he lodged a complaint on the very same day before the third respondent police, which was registered as CSR.No.24 of 2026. Since the petitioner’s wife could not be secured within a reasonable time, the present Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed.

¶34

When the matter came up for hearing today in the forenoon, the third

¶35

respondent police produced the detenue before this Court. Thereupon, this Court directed the third respondent police to produce the private respondents before this Court and passed over the matter.

¶36

__________ Page3 of 6

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

HCP No. 224 of 2026

¶39

When the matter was called again thereafter, the third respondent police produced the detenue, as well as the mother of the detenue, who is the 6^th respondent herein. Upon interaction, the detenue stated that she did not go with

¶40

the petitioner on her own volition and that she had not given her free consent for the marriage, alleging that she was earlier subjected to threat and coercion. She,

¶41

however, categorically stated that she is presently not under any illegal custody.

¶42

Since the detenue has expressed that she is not under any illegal

¶43

custody at present, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout the remedy in the manner known to law.

¶44

(P.V.,J.) (M.J.R.,J.) 06-02-2026

¶45

Index: Yes/No

¶46

Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶47

ANU

¶48

¶49