Disposed

V.Bhuvaneshwari v. Mr. J.Kumaragurubaran and another

Madras HC6 Feb 2026CONT P/3711/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging disobedience to an earlier order. Respondents submitted an enquiry report dated 05.02.2026 showing compliance with the prior judgment. Court accepted submissions and closed the petition without penalties.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition closed on filing of compliance report dated 05.02.2026.

V.Bhuvaneshwari Vs Mr. J.Kumaragurubaran and another — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

Cont.P.No.3711 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 06.02.2026

¶4

Coram:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

¶6

Cont.P.No.3711 of 2025

V.Bhuvaneshwari

... Petitioner

Vs.

Mr.J.Kumaragurubaran, The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Buildings, No.1131. EVR Periyar Salai, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.

¶11

Mr.Banukumar The Zonal Officer, Zone IX, Division 109, Greater Chennai Corporation, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.

¶12

...Respondents

¶13

Prayer : This Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for disobedience of the order dated 11.06.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.19529 of 2025.

¶14

1 / 3

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Cont.P.No.3711 of 2025

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Krishnan

¶18

For Respondents : Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, Standing Counsel for Greater Chennai Corporation *******

¶19

ORDER

¶20

(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.)

¶21

This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for their disobedience of the order dated 11.06.2025 in W.P.No.19529 of 2025.

¶22

2 Today, when the matter is called for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents/contemnors would submit that pursuant to the order of this Court dated 11.06.20256, enquiry was conducted in the presence of the petitioner and final order also passed and the same was communicated to the petitioner. To prove the said compliance, the learned counsel produced proceedings dated 05.02.2026.

¶23

3 Recording the above submissions and the compliance, this Contempt

¶24

Petition stands closed.

[PVJ] [MJRJ]

06.02.2026

cgi

2 / 3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

Cont.P.No.3711 of 2025

¶31

P.VELMURUGAN. J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

¶32

cgi

¶33

Cont.P.No.3711 of 2025

¶34

06.02.2026

¶35

3 / 3

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Bhuvaneshwari v. Mr. J.Kumaragurubaran and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Bhuvaneshwari v. Mr. J.Kumaragurubaran and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishore Dhanji Patel Vs The Commissioner of Police

Soundari Vs State rep by its The Deputy Inspector General of Prison

Chinnapaiyan @ Chinnavan @ Suriya Vs The State rep by Inspector of Police

M. Jaiganesh Vs The Superintendent of Police

T.Muthusamy, Vs Thirumathi. P.Malarvizhi

K.Gopinath Vs The state, The Inspector of Police