Suba Devi Vs The State of TamilNadu, Rep by its principal Secretary

Prayer in HCP No. 1657 of 2025: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ or a Direction, Calling for the records relating to the detention order in 486/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 24.07.2025 passed by the 2^nd

¶117

Page 7 of 18

¶118

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶119

HCP No. 1657 of 2025 & etc batch.

¶120

Respondent Under the Tamilnadu Act 14 of 1982 and quash the same and direct the Respondents to produce the detenu Premkumar, aged 35 years, S/o. Manickam, who is presently confined in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.

¶121

Prayer in HCP No. 1776 of 2025: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other writ or order in the nature of Writ of call for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the 2^nd respondent dated 24.07.2025 in detention order NO.484/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 against the petitioner’s husband Muthuramalingam, male, aged about 45 years, S/o. Saivam who is confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai-66 and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to produce the detenue before this Honble Court and set him at liberty.

¶122

Prayer in HCP No. 1669 of 2025: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ or Direction, calling for the entire records connected with the detention order of the 2^nd respondent in No.483/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 24.07.2025 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the petitioner’s husband namely Muthulingam, S/o.Balasubramanian aged about 42 years detained in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Honble Court and set him at liberty.

¶123

Prayer in HCP No. 1718 of 2025: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of habeas Corpus or any other writ or a direction, Calling for the records relating to the detention order in No.488/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 24.07.2025 passed by the 2^nd respondent under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and quash the same and direct the Respondents to produce the detenu Dheena @ Dhinakaran, S/o. Ravikumar, aged 35 years, who is presently confined in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.

¶124

Prayer in HCP No. 1699 of 2025: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of habeas Corpus or any other Writ or direction, calling for the records relating to the detention order in 485/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 24.07.2025 passed by the 2^nd respondent under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu Kamal @ Prabhu, S/o. Muniyasamy, aged 35

¶125

Page 8 of 18

¶126

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶127

HCP No. 1657 of 2025 & etc batch.

¶128

years, who is presently confined in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Hon’ble Court and set him at liberty and pass such further or other orders that this Hon’ble Court.

¶129

Prayer in HCP No. 2001 of 2025: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records, relating to petitioner’s husband detention under Tamil nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order, dated 11.08.2025 on the file of the second respondent herein made in proceedings No.559/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the said petitioner’s husband namely Nagendran, aged 60 years, Son of Murugan, before this Hon'ble High Court and set him at liberty, now petitioners husband detained at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai 600066.

¶130

Prayer in HCP No. 1763 of 2025: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other writ or order in the nature of writ call for the records in connection with the order of Detention passed by the 2^nd Respondent dated 24.07.2025 in No.487/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 against the petitioner’s brother Thiru.Prabu, aged 42 years, S/o.Periya Karuppan, who is confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai and to set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents to produce the detenue before the Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.

¶131

Prayer in HCP No. 2314 of 2025: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ or direction, Calling for the entire records connected with the detention order of the 2^nd respondent in No.768/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 07.10.2025 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the petitioner’s brother namely Karthik @ Karthikeyan S/o.Muthukumar aged about 39 years detained in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Honourable Court and set him at liberty.

¶132

Prayer in HCP No. 2305 of 2025: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ of Direction, calling for the entire records connected with the detention order of the 2^nd respondent in

¶133

Page 9 of 18

¶134

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶135

HCP No. 1657 of 2025 & etc batch.

¶136

No.767/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 07.10.2025 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the petitioner’s brother namely Bharathi S/o.Mookkaiyan aged about 35 years detained in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, before this Honourable Court and set him at liberty forthwith and pass such further or others orders as this Hon’ble Court.

¶137

Prayer in HCP No. 2629 of 2025: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate Writ or Order or direction 07.10.2025 in detention order No.769/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 on the file of the Second Respondent herein and quash the same and direct the Respondents herein to produce the my son of the detenue Chellapandi, S/o. Muthukumar Hindu aged about 27 Years, who is now confined in central prison Puzhal before the Hon’ble Court and set him at liberty and pass such further or other orders.

¶138

HCP.Nos.	For petitioner	For respondents
1657 and 2001 of 2025	Mr.C.C.Chellappan	Mr. R. Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted By Mr. M. Sylvester John
1776 of 2025	Mr.M.Soundar Vijay Arul Ram	Mr. R. Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted By Mr. M. Sylvester John
1669, 2314 and 2305 of 2025	Mr.B.M.Santharam	Mr. R. Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted By Mr. M. Sylvester John
1718 and 1699 of 2025	Ms.Vindhya	Mr. R. Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted By Mr. M. Sylvester John
1763 of 2025	Mr.R.Anbazhagan	Mr. R. Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted By

¶139

__________ Page 10 of 18

¶140

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶141

HCP No. 1657 of 2025 & etc batch.

¶142

		Mr. M. Sylvester John
2629 of 2025	Mr.R.Thamarai Selvan	Mr. R. Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor
		Assisted By
		Mr. M. Sylvester John

¶143

COMMON ORDER

¶144

(Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.)

¶145

We have heard Mr.C.C.Chellappan, learned counsel for the petitioners in HCP Nos. 1657 and 2001 of 2025, Mr.M.Soundar Vijay Arul Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner in HCP No.1776 of 2025, Mr.B.M.Santharam, learned counsel for the petitioners in HCP Nos.1669, 2314 and 2305 of 2025, Ms.Vindhya, learned counsel for the petitioner in HCP Nos. 1718 and 1699 of 2025, Mr.R.Anbazhagan, learned counsel for the petitioner in HCP No.1763 of 2025, Mr.R.Thamarai Selvan, learned counsel for the petitioner in HCP No.2629 of 2025 and Mr.Muniyapparaj, learned Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.Sylvester John, learned counsel for the respondents.

¶146

This is a batch of 10 HCPs, where the detenus are all co-accused in Cr.No.490 of 2025. All the detenus have been branded as Goonda in terms of Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982) (in short ‘Act’). The details of detention, such as name of the detenu, corresponding HCP, date of detention and name of the prison in which the detenus are confined are as follows:

¶147

__________ Page 11 of 18

¶148

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶149

HCP No. 1657 of 2025 & etc batch.

¶150

S.No.	HCP.No.	Details of t detenue	he	Detention details	Order	Confined in
1.	1657 of 2025	Premkumar, aged S/o.Manickam	male, 35,	No.486/ BBCDEFGI 2025 24.07.2025	SSSV/ dated	Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.
2.	1776 of 2025	Muthuramalin male, aged S/o.Saivam	gam, 45,	No.484/ BBCDEFGI 2025 24.07.2025	SSSV/ dated	Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.
3.	1669 of 2025	Muthulingam, aged S/o.Balasubra	male, 42, manian	No.483/ BBCDEFGI 2025 24.07.2025	SSSV/ dated	Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.
4.	1718 of 2025	Dheena Dinakaran, aged S/o.Ravikumar	@ male, 35,	No.488/ BBCDEFGI 2025 24.07.2025	SSSV/ dated	Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.
5.	1699 of 2025	Kamal @ P male, aged S/o.Muniyasam	rabhu, 35, y	No.485/ BBCDEFGI 2025 24.07.2025	SSSV/ dated	Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.
6.	2001 of 2025	Nagendran, aged S/o.Murugan	male, 60,	No.559/ BBCDEFGI 2025 11.08.2025	SSSV/ dated	Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.
7.	1763 of 2025	Prabu, male, 42, S/o.	aged Periya	No.487/ BBCDEFGI	SSSV/	Central Prison, Puzhal,
		Karuppan		2025 24.07.2025	dated	Chennai.
8.	2314 of 2025	Karthik	@	No.768/		Central Prison,

¶151

__________ Page 12 of 18

¶152

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶153

HCP No. 1657 of 2025 & etc batch.

¶154

9.	2305 of 2025	Karthikeyan, aged S/o.Muthukum Bharathi, male 35, S/o.Mookk	male, 39, ar , aged aiyan	BBCDEFGI 2025 07.10.2025 No.767/ BBCDEFGI 2025 07.10.2025	SSSV/ dated SSSV/ dated	Puzhal, Chennai. Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.
10.	2629 of 2025	Chellapandi, aged S/o.Muthukum	Male, 27, ar	No.769/ BBCDEFGI 2025 07.10.2025	SSSV/ dated	Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

¶155

The sequence in terms of which charge sheet has been laid are also

¶156

identical across the detenus, being under Sections 61(2), 126(2), 137(2) and 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Scheme, 2023 (BNSS).

¶157

All learned counsel for the petitioner, in one voice, would assail the impugned orders of detention stating that there has been non-application of mind by the detaining authority to the matter. The primary ground on which their defence rests is that the authority has proceeded on the basis that the detenus will be enlarged on bail citing the order passed in Crl.O.P.No.25228 of 2024 dated 14.10.2024.

¶158

Per contra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that though there were some incidental differences between the crimes in the

¶159

Page 13 of 18

¶160

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶161

HCP No. 1657 of 2025 & etc batch.

¶162

comparable case and the case of the detenus, the offences committed were all major offences attracting similar punishments.

¶163

Hence, notwithstanding that there is no identity between the case of the detenus and the comparable case cited by the detaining authority, the differences are not such as to vitiate the subjective satisfaction of the officer. He would also submit that in three of the cases, the detenus (HCP Nos.2314, 2305 and 2629 of 2025) have been detained only in October, 2025 and hence there is no justification to intervene in their cases as of now.

¶164

In all cases, the detaining authority has relied upon the order passed by this Court on 14.10.2024 in Crl.O.P.No.25228 of 2024 granting bail to the accused in that case. However, on a comparison of the offences in the present cases and in that case, we find that there is no identity, in that the major offence in the relied-upon case is in respect of robbery, whereas in the present case, the offences alleged are conspiracy, kidnapping and dacoity as a group with arms. In fact, the offences in the present matters are far graver in nature.

¶165

Hence, as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners, there is no justification or basis for the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority while comparing the case of the petitioners with that of the accused in Crl.O.P.No.25228 of 2024.

¶166

__________ Page 14 of 18

¶167

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶168

HCP No. 1657 of 2025 & etc batch.

¶169

As regards the objection of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor

¶170

that the detention in some of the cases are only in October, 2025, we may only point out that there is no minimum period of detention that is required under an

¶171

order of preventive detention. Once the Court finds that the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority is unjustified and reveals non-application of mind, preventive detention, even for a day, cannot stand.

¶172

10.In fact, the consolidation of these petitions is only at the instance of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor who had sought clubbing of the matters, and rightly so, on the ground that the detenus were co-accused in the same crime number.

¶173

In light of the aforesaid discussion, these Habeas Corpus Petitions are

¶174

allowed and the Detention Orders passed by the second respondent in 486/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 24.07.2025, 484/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 24.07.2025, No.483/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 24.07.2025, No.488/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 24.07.2025, No.485/BBCDEFGISSSV /2025 dated 24.07.2025, No.559/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 11.08.2025, No.487/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 24.07.2025, No.768/BBCDEFGISSSV/ 2025 dated 07.10.2025, No.767/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 07.10.2025 and No.769/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 07.10.2025 are set aside.

¶175

The detenus, viz., Premkumar, S/o.Manickam, male aged 35 years, Muthuramalingam, S/o. Saivam, male aged 45 years, Muthulingam,

¶176

Page 15 of 18

¶177

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶178

HCP No. 1657 of 2025 & etc batch.

¶179

S/o.Balasubramanian, male aged 42 years, Dheena @ Dinakaran, S/o.Ravikumar, male aged 35 years, Kamal @ Prabhu, S/o.Muniyasamy, male aged 35 years, Nagendran, S/o.Murugan, male aged 60 years, Prabu, S/o.Periya Karuppan, male aged 42 years, Karthik @ Karthikeyan, S/o.Muthukumar, male aged 39 years, Bharathi, S/o.Mookkaiyan, male aged 35 years and Chellapandi, S/o.Muthukumar, male aged 27 years, who are now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, are directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless their presence is required in connection with any other case.

¶180

(A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 06-04-2026

¶181

sl

¶182

Index: Yes/No Speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes Note: Issue today.

¶183

To

¶184