Ramapriya v. a.Balasubramanian
Case brief
What is this about?
Third-party impleadment as defendant refused at judgment stage; applicant claiming tenancy under original tenant (sub-tenancy) versus counsel's plea of direct tenancy under the landlord/first respondent; collateral adjudication of tenancy-nature disputes disallowed in revision; belated impleadment application treated as delay tactic to protract suit and stall judgment; Article 227 constitutional revision; dismissal with costs of Rs. 10,000/- to Advocate Welfare Fund for vexatious petition; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; O.S. No.18 of 2024, District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Watrap, Virudhunagar District; connected C.M.P(MD) No.1172 of 2026 closed.
What did the court decide?
None to the petitioner; the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed with costs of Rs.10,000/- payable to the credit of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Advocate Welfare Fund (A/c.No.7087208431, Indian Bank, Madurai Bench Campus) within two weeks; the connected Miscellaneous Petition (C.M.P(MD) No.1172 of 2026) is closed with no costs.