Tamilselvi v. Tamilselvam
Case brief
What is this about?
Impleadment as party defendant refused; necessary/unnecessary party determination affirmed by revision under Article 227. Claimant under unregistered Vardamana document (1998, plaintiff's father) versus plaintiff under registered release deed with mutated revenue records; claimant's rights protected in her separate pending suit O.S. No. 12 of 2023 (permanent injunction, same property, same Court); impleading application I.A. No. 3 of 2023 filed after suit posted for ex parte evidence. Trial Court (District Munsif, Sirkazhi) order dated 10.01.2024 upheld; C.R.P. 724/2025 dismissed; interim order vacated; no costs; C.M.P. 4134/2025 closed. Bench: Abdul Quddhose, J. (single judge, no dissent). Keywords: implead, impleadment, party defendant, necessary party, unnecessary party, Vardamana document, unregistered document, release deed, permanent injunction, ex parte evidence, O.S. No. 237 of 2022, O.S. No. 12 of 2023, I.A. No. 3 of 2023, Madras High Court.